Review 300
by Seyed Mohamad N.
Since Lords of the Ring, Peter
Jackson a legendary director has set a new trend, a trend that many multi
million budget movies had tried to copy and transform into a cliché, a cliché
that is not working anymore. Audience does want to see that but there is no
more.
This matrix selling, tried to be
Lord of the ring, Braveheartish movie had something else at the first glance.
The Persian old saying for this is: “Drum has stunning sound but with nothing
inside”.
When the teaser of 300 was
released, it was eye catching and stunned every single audience. It had a message that wanted to say this
is just part of the great battle and a great detailed story.
After the first public release
of the movie, for the first quarter of the movie time all audiences were waiting
for the battle to start and when the battled started it was good. It was part
of the trailer they saw. And this was just part of their expectation. But it
did only show one part of the formation of armies which was only Spartan side and
no sign of Persians. How did that multi-million army, the greatest and the
largest of army of all time gathered into a single group? What kind of organization
was there to control that massive army? How did they plan and how did they
move? Even Peter Jackson spent a while showing the enemy and how it was formed
and motivated. It even showed a bit of audacity in the enemy, something that
was ZERO in Persian side. But was there absolutely not a single human being
among those 2.7 million (according to Herodotus) had not a single strong person
to show in the movie? Or it has be movie selling junk? Was it again another
fast-food movie?
Yet audience expected more. They
wanted to know what movie has to offer beside those eye catching shots from the
teaser. That nice “THIS IS SPARTA” was the nicest phrase and gesture from
Gerard Butler in the movie and it was already shown and it already spoiled, in
fact it looked nicer in the teaser than the movie itself.
Zack Snyder had actually offered
his best parts except few into the teaser. That made the movie a big shot
box-office to start but will it last for another one month?
By the time that this article is
written it is not even end of the first weekend but it smells that it is
another Troy. Yet
another big shot by big stars and polished, eye catching colors movie made by computer graphics.
The word Persian was mentioned
more than a hundred times and Xerxes was mentioned more than ten times. It was
shown as a naked, shaved, homosexual king. So it was supposed to be based on true
existing country and true existing battle and of course it is undeniable by any
audience that is illustration of battle of Thermopylae.
But was it loyal? Was it even tried to be loyal? It was all fantasy, but the
director did not even dare to mention that it was fantasized by writer and many
characters was added just to make movie sellable!
It was clear that even in the
Spartan way of fight they added technique of fighting that was not even exist
or being used by them but just to make the movie look better and nicer.
The Persian generals and armies
looked anything but Persians. From Indian to Arabs or even Chinese and even the
king is looking absolutely Indian with many pierces and jewels that only used
by Indians.
Apparently nor the director or
writers or even novelist did even do a simple Google search as part of study of
making a movie based on historical names and facts. Just googling the name
Xerxes in google image will result him on top of the page and impossible to
miss. That Xerxes has very long bear, he wears a cylinder eastern style hat
(which used to be black in color) and a clothing that fully cover body, but not naked. He wears a very long and very covering frock
that is indistinguishable in pictures carved on stone from his own palace.
The military techniques of
Persian was not shown at all in the movie. It was pack of lies when they
crossed the sea when it did not showed who exactly was the first maker of
longest floating bridge of all time joing Europe and Asia to pass more than
million people and horses and elephants.
Persian were called barbarian
many times just to fulfill the Spartan hatred and only to fake audience point
of view in Spartan way.
But why everything is
Americanized? Why Americans want to show everything so American? Was Spartan
indeed acting like American army? Was American army based or inspired from
Spartans?
I was personally disappointed
from Frank Miller, specially being a translator of his previous art “Sin City” and I believe he
indeed destroyed his art by his wrong illustration of one side of battle
(looser or winner) without any neutral point of view in regard of a historical
event.
I wished 300 was another
independent movie from Frank Miller but it was not anymore.
I wish one day I can have that
strength and that power to show the world the truth about Persians and their
heritage.